|
Post by Crash Enburn on Mar 9, 2018 14:53:00 GMT -5
It's come up many times. Having your weight sit low in the car provides more energy than a weight that sits high up. In this pic, I've imagined a car that could have weight in the body, 3/8" from the track, or a weight 2-3/8" up from the track. The low weight actually falls almost a quarter inch further than the high weight. (The measurements in the pic are actually off by a very wee bit: the vertical line (hypotenuse) of the weight-to-track actually intersects the track further down for the "higher" weight than the same line on the lower, so the "low" weight falls that wee bit further)
|
|
|
Post by Ember on Mar 9, 2018 15:15:24 GMT -5
Yes the height wouldn't matter on a track with a continual slope, but on a track with a slope and flat run there is a difference. I always took it to an extreme to visualize it in my mind. I would envision a car with a 2' rod at the rear with the weights on top, when the car sits level all looks fine, but when you put it on the slope the weights rotate forward a bit and are slightly lower than they once were.
|
|